• About Us
  • Professional Trustees
    • Professional Trustees
    • Chair of Trustees
    • Co-Trustee
    • Sole Trusteeship
  • Our Services
    • Our Services
    • DB Pension Schemes
    • DC Pension Schemes & DC Master Trusts
    • Investment & Funding Strategy
    • Master Trust Transition
    • Pensions Manager
    • Project Management
    • Regulatory
    • Relationship & Conflict Management
    • Risk Transfer
    • Scheme Discontinuance
    • Scheme Secretary
    • Transactions & Restructuring
  • Our Team
  • Case Studies
  • News & Views
  • Careers
  • Useful Links
  • Contact Us
Telephone
T: +44 (0)20 4599 7299
E: info@rosstrustees.com
Search
Ross Trustees

Insights

The timely arrival of the APPT’s Code of Practice

01 October 2020

The recent release of the sole trustee Code of Practice (CoP) from the Association of Professional Pension Trustees (APPT) will ensure a continued drive for improved governance and standards for pension schemes. It also provides a benchmark for sponsors and advisers of schemes when selecting a Professional Corporate Sole Trustee (PCST), should that model be an appropriate option for them.

Many in the industry may be questioning why the CoP is needed now and how it will be enforced. Others may be wondering whether the CoP will have any authority as it is not mandatory or legally enforceable. There may be some who may feel a sole trustee is a perfidious way for an employer to further its own interests. These are fair challenges and can be tackled head on.

So why is the PCST model needed now? There are a multitude of reasons: financial volatility and the spectre of negative interest rates; the continuous governance a pension scheme now demands; regulatory scrutiny and tightening of legislation; and sponsor stress and, in some cases, distress due to Covid-19, as well as the uncertainty of Brexit. Individually these factors could derail a well-managed scheme, combined they will magnify the issues faced unless managed professionally and with alacrity.

The CoP, and the professional trustee standards released in 2019, have both been long overdue from a risk management perspective. There is no barrier to entry for an individual to call themselves an independent or professional trustee in an industry holding £1.7trn of assets, which are still managed predominately by lay individuals.

It is widely accepted that not every scheme needs, or indeed will ever have, a professional trustee on its board let alone appoint a PCST. Is it, however, in the best financial interests of beneficiaries to use a model that may not be fit for purpose when an alternative risk management structure is available? It is also accepted that, although the PCST model is not always perfect, it does promote efficiencies as well as neutralising sensitivities that may veil some of the thinking and clarity of thought needed when tough decisions are required.

The PCST model allows mitigation of risk through speed of decision making, acting impartially and implementing best practice. Cutting edge innovation is also adopted without lengthy discussions and training sessions. We have seen many scenarios where a PCST has delivered better outcomes, be it capturing market opportunities during periods of volatility, reviewing advisers or enhancing relationships with employer and overseas sponsors and their advisers too.

It has been noted that it is not only sponsors who are viewing PCSTs with a keen interest but trustee boards too in terms of managing continuity, longevity and succession planning.

How will the PCST model be enforced and actually have some teeth?

The answers lie through both promoting and policing the standards and through the PCST firms holding themselves accountable through a transparent reporting mechanism. Embedding the CoP in the audit and assurance frameworks of PCSTs is a must have and an easy way to measure compliance. The pensions community may well develop a framework whereby PCSTs are reviewed, much like the CMA order where investment consultants are set objectives and reviewed.

The Pensions Regulator has a part to play too and it was encouraging to see the positive comments made in relation to the CoP. Perhaps this could be taken a step further in the future with a “comply or explain” regime monitored through the Scheme Return showing whether a scheme has a professional trustee and/or the sole trustee model.

The CoP is a welcome development, however it is the first step into further refining and improving the governance of those ultimately accountable for ensuring the benefits from a scheme are paid whilst acknowledging their responsibility to sponsors too.

WHAT'S NEW?

15 Dec 2022

Happy birthday…to us!

We spoke to three of our most long-standing employees.

READ MORE

06 Dec 2022

Recruitment challenges leave large employers at risk from pensions management skills gap

In-house pensions managers are a crucial but often overlooked role within a company.

READ MORE

21 Nov 2022

Ross Trustees secures trio of strategic hires

Three new hires join Ross Trustees.

READ MORE

QUICK LINKS

  • About Us
  • Professional Trustees
  • Our Services
  • Team
  • News & Views
  • Careers
  • Useful Links
  • Contact Us
  • Data Privacy
  • Diversity & Inclusion
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Modern Day Slavery Statement

ADDRESS

Westgate House
9 Holborn, London
EC1N 2LL

CONTACT

T: +44 (0)20 4599 7299
E: info@rosstrustees.com

LinkedIn

Ross Trustees Services Limited (company registration number 07904277) and Ross Corporate Services Limited (company registration number 07104969) are registered in England and Wales.
Registered offices are at Westgate House, 9 Holborn, London EC1N 2LL

Copyright © 2023 Ross Trustees Services Limited & Ross Corporate Services Limited. All Rights Reserved.

We are audited annually by the Audit and Assurance Faculty (AAF) and are currently AAF 02/07 accredited.

NEWSLETTER

Join our mailing list

  • When you submit this form, the personal data provided will be used to respond to your query and to provide information to you about what we do and how we do it. We will hold the personal data you provide securely and may send you information in the future about our services. You will always have the opportunity to opt out of receiving any further communications from us.

    If you wish to know more about how we process your personal data and understand your rights, please see our Data Privacy statement.